Gators!
The New OPFOR

Copyright 2002 by Mike Fischer
Last modified: 05/23/2003

I. Introduction

For those of you who have played Gators! and would like to put some spin on the ball, I offer you a variation on the opposing force (OPFOR). The basic OPFOR used in Gators!, Airborne!, and Rangers! is based on American equipment from the 1950's and 60's. These new additions to the OPFOR are based on 1980's-vintage weapons from the Soviet Union, and they pack a lot more of a wallop. Most of these vehicles were exported to other nations, so your scenarios can still be based on brushfire wars anywhere in the world. I haven't written any scenarios, but this document includes a few general suggestions.

This new OPFOR provides vehicles and aircraft to replace their equivalent units in the basic OPFOR. You will still need that OPFOR to provide soldiers, light vehicles, and counters. The new units follow the standard rules for the game without modification.

II. The Units

If a vehicle can carry a "special team," that means a mortar team, Dragon team, or Stinger team. A heavy-weapons platoon is equivalent to an infantry platoon. The counter sheet also includes Armor-type Air-Attack Markers and Ground-Attack Markers. The Ground-Attacks are for BMP-2's. The OPFOR never had an anti-armor attack from the air before; only the Mi-24 and SU-25 can use these.

Some of the new air units are better defense ratings than the other air units in the game. How this will affect ground-to-air and air-to-air combat, I'm not sure.

III. Setting Up the Game

At present, I have provided no special scenarios for this new OPFOR. Here are a few general suggestions for using them.
  1. Use the new units in the existing scenarios to make things tougher for the Americans. The T-72 replaces the M48 tank, the BMP-2 fills in for the M113, the Jeep A's and R's become BRDM's, the Helo's get replaced by MI-24's, and the A-4's and/or Fighters turn into SU-25's. Don't use all six of any of them, or the Americans won't have a chance.
  2. Because so many of the Soviet vehicles are amphibious, this suggests a river-crossing attack.
  3. Or how about a nation in turmoil, facing both US intervention and a simultaneous OPFOR invasion across the beaches? Perhaps the OPFOR has to sieze a coastal city, and then can bring in a given amount of reinforcements each turn through that seaport.
  4. Consider a 3-player scenario -- the USA, the locals using the standard OPFOR, and the locals' unfriendly neighbors with the new units, with some kind of pen mark on their infantry and similar units to tell them apart from the locals. Say the neighbors are looking for an excuse to move in on the locals, the Americans want to prevent this, and the locals don't want either of them around. Kind of like Harold Coyle's book, Sword Point, about a USSR invasion of Iran and an American counter-invasion.
  5. For the ultimate, combine the last two ideas. The Marines invade an island from one side, the new OPFOR swims ashore from the other side, and they have to race each other to secure the capital city in the middle. The local army gets sandwiched between them, and can win by delaying them enough.

IV. Game Tables

Player 2 Units
UnitQtyTypeAttackAtk RangeDefendMove
BRDM6Amphib1/0/011A4/1
BMP-26Amphib1/1/111A3/1
T-72 Tank6Land1/3/0123
PT-76 Tank6Amphib1/2/0113/1
Mi-24 Helicopter4Airvaries126
Mi-8 Helicopter4Air1/0/0116
SU-25 Jet4Airvaries128

Transport Table- Air/SSM-Attack Table
UnitTrans CapacityAir UnitAir-Attack Markers
BMP-21 special teamMi-244 Ground or Armor, in pairs
Mi-242 special teamsSu-254 any kind, in pairs; 1 Air
Mi-81 platoon
"In pairs" means you can have two of one kind of marker and two of another, or four of one kind.

V. Designer's Notes

There is just so much fascinating military hardware out there! I wish I had the time and energy to make rules and counters for all of them. But I don't, so I have to prioritize, and Soviet equipment deserves high priority, mostly because it's everywhere. And this project has been sitting on my back burner for months -- I finally got around to it. Several people have asked about such an OPFOR; I hope it's what you wanted. As usual, constructive comments are welcome. Enjoy!

Mike Fischer
mfischer@naisp.net